Skip to main content

Considering(?) the divine...

Considering(?) the divine versus the divine being, is there a difference? Is it meaningful? Can divine exist without a divine being? I don't know. listen

Powered by Jott

Comments

dkearns72 said…
Many, many religious traditions argue for the divine without using a single being (or many beings) with individual will(s). i would argue that Buddhism presents a very well developed sense of the possibility. The one that I like to study most myself comes from the more theologically-inclined Hindus who would argue that the many gods are only a simple way for humans to think of The Oneness that is all. and that Oneness is not a being with an identifiable single will.
June 6, 2008 at 11:11 PM
dkearns72 said…
the sense of the divine (as in more "fullness" to the cosmos than we can completely use our sensations for) goes back as far back as we can trace with funerary rites. the notion that the divine=The Divine, though, is almost certainly an Axial Age innovation, probably no earlier than the Jews coming back from exile. Their previous "monotheism" seems to have actually been "henotheism" where there is one primary god among many lesser gods: http://tinyurl.com/4o5vnd

Upshot: most people through human history until historical times would have believed in the divine without The Divine.
June 6, 2008 at 11:19 PM
dkearns72 said…
My take on the subject is straight from Rudolf Otto, and the wikipedia entry here, http://tinyurl.com/4zndtd nails it quite nicely:

"The German theologian Rudolf Otto, in The Idea of the Holy (originally in German, Das Heilige), defined the holy as an experience of something "wholly other," most famously mysterium tremendum et fascinans, a frightening and fascinating mystery.[3] (He was following the tradition of Friedrich Schleiermacher, who defined religion as a feeling or experience rather than adherence to doctrine.) Otto claimed that this experience was unlike any other; the subject experienced the spirit (the numinous, in Otto's terminology) as overwhelming, sublime, truly real, while he or she was nothing."
June 6, 2008 at 11:25 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No news is no news

I'll be travelling for the next few days. That means even fewer than the already infrequent posts of normal. But, if you're good -- I'm mean really good -- while I'm gone, I'll hopefully have some cool picks to share when I get back. Then again, if you're not good and I have to pull this blog over to the side of the road just one more time then I'm cancelling Christmas!!! (I know, you don't get it. Probably because you weren't there when our fine father quieted 2 very unruly kids with that threat. It was July and legend has it we actually behaved all the way through the middle of November.) Jim
Post a Comment
Read more

On those gas situations;...

So not only does the gas pump cap out at a $65 or $75 withdrawal on an ATM card, they don't really have that cleared with the banks. If you topped out $75 in your Jeep and you put more money in by reentering your card, if you do that, say twice in the same weekend, the next time you go to take cash out you're screwed: "sorry we put a fraud lock on your card because we were afraid it was being used after having been stolen, being used twice for gas within a few minute is a fraud sign." Note, the bank they did the right thing. The gas companies, they're just screw us every which way we go. listen Powered by Jott
1 comment
Read more