Skip to main content

Considering(?) the divine...

Considering(?) the divine versus the divine being, is there a difference? Is it meaningful? Can divine exist without a divine being? I don't know. listen

Powered by Jott

Comments

dkearns72 said…
Many, many religious traditions argue for the divine without using a single being (or many beings) with individual will(s). i would argue that Buddhism presents a very well developed sense of the possibility. The one that I like to study most myself comes from the more theologically-inclined Hindus who would argue that the many gods are only a simple way for humans to think of The Oneness that is all. and that Oneness is not a being with an identifiable single will.
June 6, 2008 at 11:11 PM
dkearns72 said…
the sense of the divine (as in more "fullness" to the cosmos than we can completely use our sensations for) goes back as far back as we can trace with funerary rites. the notion that the divine=The Divine, though, is almost certainly an Axial Age innovation, probably no earlier than the Jews coming back from exile. Their previous "monotheism" seems to have actually been "henotheism" where there is one primary god among many lesser gods: http://tinyurl.com/4o5vnd

Upshot: most people through human history until historical times would have believed in the divine without The Divine.
June 6, 2008 at 11:19 PM
dkearns72 said…
My take on the subject is straight from Rudolf Otto, and the wikipedia entry here, http://tinyurl.com/4zndtd nails it quite nicely:

"The German theologian Rudolf Otto, in The Idea of the Holy (originally in German, Das Heilige), defined the holy as an experience of something "wholly other," most famously mysterium tremendum et fascinans, a frightening and fascinating mystery.[3] (He was following the tradition of Friedrich Schleiermacher, who defined religion as a feeling or experience rather than adherence to doctrine.) Otto claimed that this experience was unlike any other; the subject experienced the spirit (the numinous, in Otto's terminology) as overwhelming, sublime, truly real, while he or she was nothing."
June 6, 2008 at 11:25 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Almost famous, again

I made Andrew Sullivan's " The View from Your Window " again: http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/11/the-view-fro-25.html He captioned it incorrectly. I twas actually taken at 00:05 -- i.e., 5 minutes past midnight. The orangish color is from the tungsten filament light bulbs -- while they appear light to your eye, they are really orangish. Your brain is pretty smart and adjusts for this (and for fluorescent, or mercury vapor, or even sunny versus cloudy sunlight.) So, that's the Santa Monica office and the LA apartment....next stop, Lompoc! See also: Fame Awaits
4 comments
Read more

Fields of Lompoc -- Evening Clouds Approaching

Fields of Lompoc -- Evening Clouds Approaching Originally uploaded by VagabondJim Not much to write today. I t was a hectic day at work because we had a manditory "team bulding event". Everybody had to leave the office by 11am. Don't get me wrong, these are fun events -- but they seem to coincide with days that are awful for me. Sometimes they kill my chance at getting ahead of the L.A. traffic for the drive to Lompoc. And, they occasionally involve doing things that I would rather do with Janice -- and then she's bummed too because we either miss something she'd want to do or she hates the fact that I have to re-do something (which leads her to believe it must be boring me -- usually not a true assumption.) So all-in-all I have mixed feelings. Maybe if they weren't always on Fridays. Anyway that made for a busy day. One without much to share with y'all. I did make great time driving tonight; 2:57 including about a half hour stop at Costco.
5 comments
Read more